Just get it to  Market
 Anyone else frustrated  with the proliferation of the word Beta?
 Why not just call  it half-baked code we want to build a buzz around and tell  the truth?
 I'm not sure Google  started this trend, but they certainly popularized it.  But hey, they  popularized the web, so I'll give them credit.  And when they release a Beta, it seems to be pretty  good and solid.
 But they never take the  Beta tag out.
 Breaking the Brand
 Now it seems that every  software shop or garage-coder has started putting junk on the market.  I'm  convinced they do this to stake their marketing flag rather than  to build their customer base.
 The problem is that when  you show every potential customer your wart-covered code, some of them go  elsewhere and don't come back.
 If you're upgrading or  adding new features it's fine to have a beta, but don't make it your customers'  only option.  Keep the functioning site up and put a "Care to try our  Beta?" link on it.  Microsoft does this with their pop-up "Care to try our  new Download Center® Beta?"
 Don't get me started on  pop-ups, but at least Redmond lets me stay with the Byzantine download pattern I'm  used to.
 The Final  Straw
 So now you're asking  yourself "Why's that mild-mannered WillSQL4Food all worked up today?  What pushed him over the  edge?"
 Dilbert.com, an important  part of my morning routine, was broken (beta-ed) this morning.  They taunt  me with the promise of full-color Dilbert comics every day, but dash me against  the Rocks of Beta with a cryptic error.
 Come on, Scott!   Come to think of  it, Mr. Adams probably did this to create material for some  strips.
 I just hope they're  funny.
 Thanks for stopping  by,
 Will
 
2 comments:
Why not use the beta for the buzz? Some of the users will like/dislike any given part of the software, so why not get it out there and get their opinion in the earliest part of the development cycle possible? What's wrong with that?
I agree that you can (and in many cases should) use Beta for Buzz. I don't have a problem with that.
I even encourage it on new, never-before-seen applications.
I'm talking here about existing applications.
Say you're working on version 3 of an existing application and want to create buzz on that, do it - but don't take version 2 down! Not until version 3 is ready for prime time.
Version 2 can offer users a link to V3 Beta, promote it, suggest it or whatever.
But don't take away a functional old application in favor of a buggy new one just because it's new.
Post a Comment